Request info

QA vs. QE: What Is the Best Approach for Your App Testing?

The debate between QA vs. QE and manual vs. automated has raged on. But it’s high time to end the “versus” mindset. Instead, we should focus on the strengths of both methodologies, recognizing that they play pivotal roles in ensuring top-notch user experiences and high-quality products. 

QA, emphasizing manual testing and exploratory techniques, provides the essential groundwork for identifying issues early in development. On the other hand, QE, or quality engineering, leverages automation and performance testing to dive deep into the product’s quality. 

Ensuring High-Quality User Experiences with QA

Diving Into Automation and Performance with QE

QE, or quality engineering, is another crucial aspect of your testing strategy. QE uses automated testing cases and DevOps integrations with skilled personnel to empower deeper quality strategies. Automated tests should maximize the coverage over the detailed scope of the testing phase. Good automation is reusable, versatile, and flexible, often integrating directly into your development platforms. 

Performance testing management also gives way to actionable information that can inform you and your team about what your customers are experiencing when using a product. This is invaluable when considering the testing cycle and can only benefit your team when it comes time to implement fixes and get the product out the door.

Fusing QA and QE for Better and Faster Global Products 

It can be a difficult task to understand the flaws and drawbacks of a piece of software. When using fused testing, you can significantly speed up the development process while maintaining the human touch to refine and shape your product for the end user. Fused testing allows failed automated tests to be rapidly assessed for root cause problems (flakey tests, candidate bugs, etc.) and quickly made actionable via burstable human touches.

Jumbotron image