Modern software applications demand rapid delivery, continuous integration, and cross-platform compatibility, particularly when the software experience itself is the product.
Manual testing is a type of software testing that involves testers executing test cases step-by-step, observing results firsthand, without relying on scripts or automated tools.
Software’s nature is complex and disparate, and there isn’t a one-size-fits-all way of locating faults. Different testing levels are done to catch bugs and render a hassle-free user experience. Some of the most basic yet essential tests include unit and system tests, each one of them crucial to the creation of software.
Imagine you are designing a new mobile app that will help global users in managing their schedules. You have spent a lot of time designing the features and polishing the design, but you are not sure how intuitive it really is.
As the SaaS and other IT-related markets grow and become more ingrained in the daily operations of businesses and enterprises and the lives of users, the notion of quality becomes even more critical.
25% to 35% of a software testing team’s time is spent on writing and maintaining test cases. Yet, poorly written or incomplete test cases can lead to missed defects, inefficient testing, and costly rework.
Suppose you’re working on a complex software project with a tight deadline. Your team has limited time and resources, but the application is growing in complexity with each sprint. Testing every feature thoroughly is impossible, so how do you decide what to test first?
When a new feature rolls out, the last thing any team wants is to deal with unexpected bugs slipping through testing.
Suppose you launch a new app after months of development and find out users complaining about crashes and slow performance. This is every software team’s nightmare in 2025, and exactly what quality assurance (QA) testing is used for.