Blog

With 34% of software failing to meet quality standards, and 77% of AI failures significant enough to damage user trust and product integrity, new research highlights why global brands must pair AI orchestration with expert human insight.

A lot of teams think their AI quality problem begins when the first test run starts but it usually begins much earlier.

The agentic AI conversation is too obsessed with the front door. Customer-facing agents get most of the attention because they are visible.

Many engineering leads assume game testing happens only near launch, with testers logging bugs in the final months.

One thing has become very clear from our AI chatbot testing work so far: AI quality is not as visible as people think it is.

The most dangerous multilingual AI failure is a fluent output that feels native enough to trust, but is wrong enough to mislead.

AI agents do not just respond. They interpret goals, use tools, follow workflows, apply context, and sometimes change real systems. That means they need a different kind of testing.

New offering enables enterprise customers to validate agentic workflows against a global network of skilled, real world testers before failures become customer, compliance, or brand crises.

Imagine that your studio has spent four years and $100 million developing an ambitious open-world game. Hype is sky-high, presales have already covered production costs, and profitability seems guaranteed on day one.

There’s a version of this story that gets told at conferences. A retailer demos a conversational shopping assistant. The recommendation engine surfaces exactly the right product.

AI chatbots now sit in customer journeys, product workflows, help centers, and decision paths. They represent brands, influence user trust, and increasingly, they make autonomous judgments.

New executive appointment strengthens the managed crowdsourced testing leader's commitment to advancing digital quality by pairing human expertise with AI efficiencies.